Letter to the Editor -- Fire Ring Decision Was 'The Pits'posted: 8/2/2013
Does anyone -- other than the handful of people who are lucky enough to own a house on the sand in Newport Beach, within sight of a public beach fire ring; or the handful of environmental activists that would ban anything manmade from every one of our state’s beaches, if only they could -- really want to ban fire rings from Southern California beaches?
Personally, I think the answer is obvious. It’s “no.”
But that didn’t stop our government representatives -- the elected ones on the city council, and the appointed ones in the South Coast Air Quality Management District -- from turning this non-issue into the hot-button “must-act-now” waste of time and public funds that it became this summer.
Now that they’ve paved the way for a ban of these fire rings that mainly only affects Newport Beach waterfront homes, they’re working on new time-wasting and money-wasting strategies: They’re going to study ways to convert every fire pit in the region to run on gas, in order to make it “non-polluting.” Any guesses what that will cost?
Aren’t there some important problems we should be dealing with -- and some much more worthy recipients of our taxpayer dollars -- than this?
The fire pits decision, in my opinion, was “the pits,” but I’m sure the aftermath will cost us more money -- and cause us more headaches than any of that fire smoke caused any waterfront homeowner.
Corona del Mar