Letter to the Editor — Fire Ring Decision Was ‘The Pits’

Byline: George Heath

Does anyone — other than the handful of people who are lucky enough to own a house on the sand in Newport Beach, within sight of a public beach fire ring; or the handful of environmental activists that would ban anything manmade from every one of our state’s beaches, if only they could — really want to ban fire rings from Southern California beaches?

Personally, I think the answer is obvious. It’s “no.”

But that didn’t stop our government representatives — the elected ones on the city council, and the appointed ones in the South Coast Air Quality Management District — from turning this non-issue into the hot-button “must-act-now” waste of time and public funds that it became this summer.

Now that they’ve paved the way for a ban of these fire rings that mainly only affects Newport Beach waterfront homes, they’re working on new time-wasting and money-wasting strategies: They’re going to study ways to convert every fire pit in the region to run on gas, in order to make it “non-polluting.” Any guesses what that will cost?

Aren’t there some important problems we should be dealing with — and some much more worthy recipients of our taxpayer dollars — than this?

The fire pits decision, in my opinion, was “the pits,” but I’m sure the aftermath will cost us more money — and cause us more headaches than any of that fire smoke caused any waterfront homeowner.

George Heath
Corona del Mar

Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *