Is the California angler fading into the past?

STATEWIDE — Uttering the phrase “death spiral” to any situation is rarely – if ever – a cause for optimism or celebration. So, in 2015, when the California Sportfishing League (CSL) reported California’s recreational fishing participation was, because of our licensing system, as being under threat of a death spiral the natural assumption was local watering holes were populated with a record-low number of anglers.

Perhaps the shock value of uttering “death spiral” was intended to light a fire under the seats of state legislators, urging them to update policies in the name of reigniting an industry some say is dying a slow death at the hands of bureaucratic lawmaking.

The 2015 CSL report stated recreational fishing participation declined by 55 percent within a 35-year period between 1980 and 2014. Participation declined despite a steady population growth within California during the same time period.

CSL Executive Director Marko Mlikotin identified two factors as to why fewer fishing lines appear to be dropping into onshore or offshore waters.

“Some of the major barriers to fishing are cost and value,” Mlikotin said, adding state legislators could immediately boost fishing participation by shifting the state’s practice of charging fees to a 12-month – as opposed to a calendar year – basis.

Indeed some of pointed fingers and glaring blame-stares were directed at California’s appointed policymakers and lawmakers, claiming they were responsible for the state’s dwindling participation numbers. Our rigid fishing policies were archaic and did not proactively support fishing activity, they argued.

Take the state sportfishing license fee, for example. Any California angler aged 16 or older must pay the state $47.01 (compared to $5 in 1980) for a fishing license that expires on Dec. 31 (of the year it was purchased). An angler purchasing the license on July 1 pays $47.01 no different from another angler buying the same license, say, six months earlier – yet both will expire on Dec. 31. The July 1 purchase would literally behalf the value of a license bought on Jan. 1.

The $47.01 fee might be a significant cost increase from the $5 rate in 1980 – even when adjusted for inflation ($5 in 1980 equates to $14.78 today, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics). Yet where’s the incentive to purchase a license if it’s not bought within the first few weeks of the year?

It doesn’t require a PhD to associate the reported drop in angling participation with California’s inflexible system for purchasing fishing licenses. State Sen. Tom Berryhill, R-Twain Harte, introduced Senate Bill 187 earlier this year, reviving attempts to reform California’s sportfishing fee collection standards.

“These bills don’t reduce price but bring added value. These reforms are critical,” Mlikotin said, pointing out declining license sales ultimately translate to diminished economic impact of the recreational fishing industry as a whole.

Mlikotin added the current suite of bills on the Assembly and State Senate floors would go a long way in increasing participation rates.

The CSL website also cites a few other reasons why sportfishing participation in California could be in decline. For example CSL states the California Marine Life Protection Act “limits or prohibits recreational angling in the most productive waters of California’s ocean coastline.”

At least one angler, however, does not seem concerned with the state of sportfishing in California.

Local fisherman Isaac Lemus said he does not believe California’s sportfishing license fees are too expensive, nor is the Department of Fish and Wildlife putting up any barriers to recreational fishing participation.

“Every landing and the boats charge fare prices. At times captains put money from their pockets to make sure all the fishermen get what they came for,” Lemus told The Log.

He added the state actually makes an effort to get anglers out on the water.

“On the contrary the Fish and Game Department comes up with new ways every year to make getting a fishing license easy for any new or experience angler,” Lemus said.

One area where state officials could become more proactive in increasing recreational fishing activity, according to Lemus, is in putting on more derbies and urging young people to take up angling.

Interestingly enough there is a bill on the legislative floor aiming to make recreational fishing more accessible to minors. The proposal would specifically make fishing free to non-adult residents. Current law allows anyone younger than 16 can fish for free, but a proposal making its way through Capitol Hill hopes to adjust the maximum age for cost-free angling to 18.

Mlikotin said more than 70 percent of anglers learn to fish as a child and stick with it through adulthood. Making fishing more accessible to the youth, he said, would certainly go a long way in bolstering the state’s angling participation.

“Making fishing less expensive for kids is common sense,” Mlikotin said.

The state (under Senate Bill 234) could also require California’s Fish and Game Commission to study where illegal ordinances – such as ones restricting public access to fishing – exist.

There is also a bill proposing to make the Fish and Game Commission more transparent by requiring the agency to provide free and live broadcasts of its public meetings.

 

Share This:

4 thoughts on “Is the California angler fading into the past?

  • April 27, 2017 at 2:41 pm
    Permalink

    There are 2 issues for me associated with fishing the licence fee. I don’t want a yearly licence I want a licence that prorates for the balance of the year. Buy a licence In June I should only have to pay for 6 months worth. The biggest issue is the Quagga mussel quarantines. I can’t haul my boat to my campsite or vacation spot 100 to 300 miles to get it banded 2 weeks before my vacation so i can use it when I get there. Why cant they come up with a simple method to get the boat banded locally. Maybe any place that sells fishing licences or Auto Club or any state park, or forest rangers office. This is just government going through the motions and to hell with the people they represents actual needs. They should be assisting us in access instead of taking the approach of doing enough just to say their doing some thing. They don’t want to manage they just want to herd. Too much control from people who don’t participate in the actual activities they are empowered to control.

    Reply
  • April 27, 2017 at 9:04 pm
    Permalink

    The $850. upper limit on income required for low income seniors should be increased…

    Poor seniors are being priced out of fishing in California…

    $10,000 a year is WAY below any eastablished Poverty Levels…

    Something should be done but probably won’t…

    Reply
  • April 28, 2017 at 9:30 am
    Permalink

    some comments are ridiculous…. free fishing for young people til 18 then gouge them forever after Dumb! We should be able to buy a license for any period of time desired. i.e. 1mo. $5 , 3mo.$12 , 6mo.$28 , 1 yr.$35

    Reply
  • April 29, 2017 at 7:52 am
    Permalink

    I stopped fishing because I usually only fish in the summer and the fees seemed like a rip off. I now pier fish for free. I may not catch much if anything but it is fishing and relaxing time is so good for my soul.

    Reply

Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Standing Watch/Take Action

In this section you will find resources and supplemental information on what you can do to Take Action. Submit additional information or tips on this issue to editor@thelog.com

CSL is constantly reaching out to anglers. Certain members of the state legislature have been proposing bills to benefit recreational fishing statewide.

Anyone interested in dropping a line in California’s onshore and offshore waters should proactively reach out to the following groups and legislators to advocate for fishing reform.

 

California Sportfishing League

info@savefishing.com

916-936-1777

 

Fish and Game Commission

Valerie Termini, Executive Director

valerie.termini@fgc.ca.gov

916-653-4899

 

California State Parks, Division of Boating and Waterways

Lynn Sadler, Deputy Director

lynn.sadler@parks.ca.gov

916-651-7661

 

State Sen. Mike McGuire

(Proposer of Steelhead Salmon Report Card Bill, Tribal Committee Bill)

senator.mcguire@senate.ca.gov

916-651-4002

 

State Sen. Tom Berryhill

(Proposer of 12-month Fishing License Bill, Survey of Fishing Ordinances Bill)

senator.berryhill@senate.ca.gov

916-651-4008

 

Assembly member James Gallagher

(Proposer of Veterans Fishing License Discount)

assemblymember.gallagher@assembly.ca.gov

916-319-2003

 

Assembly member Jim Patterson

(Proposer of Fish and Game Commission Transparency Bill)

assemblymember.patterson@assembly.ca.gov

916-319-2023