He indicated that the parties are planning to “close” the deal pursuant to the provisions of the vessel purchase agreement, but that the buyer is also considering the purchase of the LLC that owns the boat.
He needs to slow down a bit.
If the parties close pursuant to the provisions of the vessel purchase agreement, the LLC won’t own the boat anymore, since the purchase agreement calls for the current owner to sell the boat to the buyer. The buyer would, therefore, be purchasing a company with no assets.
If an LLC purchase is being contemplated, the parties should put the brakes on the vessel purchase — if that’s possible. At this late date, the buyer is likely obligated to purchase the boat or risk losing his deposit for breach of the purchase agreement. This is, therefore, an element of a vessel purchase transaction that needs to be considered at the beginning, rather than waiting until the last minute.
With these logistical issues in mind, let’s take a look at the transaction itself.
In California, the purchase of a corporation or an LLC that owns a boat as its sole asset is not subject to the assessment of sales or use tax (for the purposes of this discussion, there is little difference between a corporation and an LLC). This is because sales and use tax are not assessed on the purchase of corporate securities or the purchase of part or all of a business entity.
And, when the business entity is sold, there is no change in the title or ownership of the company’s assets. Since the boat is still owned by the LLC, there was no purchase or sale of the boat and nothing to assess sales or use tax against. (Note that sales and use tax are essentially the same thing, except that sales tax is assessed on the retail purchase of a new asset, while use tax is assessed on the purchase of a previously owned asset.)
We should note that this tax exemption works only when the LLC already owns the boat. Business entities are taxpayers like everyone else, and the acquisition of an asset such as a boat will be subject to the assessment of sales or use tax unless it qualifies for an exemption.
We should also note that the ownership of a boat by an LLC as the company’s sole asset is unlikely to provide any special protection against legal liability.
A “corporate shield” against personal liability may exist for a corporation or LLC that operates a legitimate business, but here we are talking about a company with no business purpose whose sole asset is a recreational vessel. In the event of a lawsuit against the owner of the vessel, a plaintiff’s attorney may be able to “pierce the corporate veil” and pursue the shareholders personally, as if the business entity did not exist.
Another logistical issue concerns the broker’s involvement in the transaction. In California, a broker who represents parties in the purchase and sale of a company or business opportunity must be licensed by the Department of Real Estate. A California Yacht and Ship Broker’s license is required for the sale of a yacht, but as noted above, the yacht in these transactions is not actually being sold.
So, with all of this in mind, we can see that ownership of a boat by a corporation or LLC is not for everyone. As noted above it may provide a buyer with a tax exemption — and, depending on your personal circumstances, it may offer other benefits — but buyers and sellers should discuss the structure with their legal or tax advisers before proceeding.