Local

Orange County contemplating answers to questions about Newport Beach docks decision

The county, which maintains jurisdiction over docks, has not yet clarified whether Sheriff lieutenant’s decision was authorized.

Editor’s Note: Carrie Braun responded in an email to Parimal M. Rohit after press time that stated Lt. Corn could make changes to the public docks via Orange County Code of Ordinance Sec. 2-2-1.

Sec. 2-2-134 on the  Maintenance of facilities reads:

“Public piers and other harbor facilities may be maintained by the County for the purpose of loading and unloading passengers, supplies and boating gear and for similar purposes. It is the policy of the County to maintain such facilities in a manner that will permit the greatest public use and avoid continuous occupancy, congestion or blocking thereof. Where necessary to achieve public use and avoid extended occupancy, congestion or blocking thereof, the Director is authorized and directed to post signs limiting the time during which a vessel may be docked or supplies or gear may be placed at or on any such pier or facility. When such sign is in place giving notice of such time limit, no person shall dock a vessel at any such facility for a period of time longer than posted or permit any supplies or gear to remain on such facility for a period of time longer than posted.”

This story will be updated at a later date.

 

NEWPORT BEACH—A simple question of whether Sheriff Lt. Chris Corn was authorized to adjust the time allowed to use a set of public docks in Newport Beach from 72 hours to 20 minutes have not yet been answered by Orange County’s in-house counsel. An Orange County spokesperson told The Log in an email the county’s CEO office is reviewing our questions. Whether our questions are answered remains to be seen.

The question of whether Corn was allowed to adjust the dock time usage unilaterally was first posed in a Standing Watch column published in the July 12-25 issue.

The Log initially reached out to the city of Newport Beach and asked whether it was proper for Corn to unilaterally adjust how long boaters could access the public docks. Newport Beach City Attorney Aaron Harp replied back to The Log via email, stating the docks in question were under Orange County jurisdiction – meaning he could not answer our question.

“It is probably best to discuss these issues with the county because the docks are on county tidelands,” Harp stated in his reply.

A follow-up with Orange County officials met with some progress. This writer reached out to Orange County’s lead in-house counsel, Leon Page, on July 18.

“As I understand it there was a change in time allowed to keep a boat at the public dock. Boats were once allowed to dock there for 72 hours. The time allowed was reduced to 20 minutes – and, the decision to reduce that time was made by Lt. Chris Corn (Sheriff’s Dept.),” this writer wrote in his email to Page.

“My question is this: Lt. Corn told us, when asked, he did nothing illegal when he adjusted the time allowable to dock at a public space,” this writer continued. “But was his act to reduce the dock usage from 72 hours to 20 minutes ‘authorized?’ Basically, is he allowed to change the timings of dock usage, or does he have to go through the county’s Board of Supervisors.”

The Sheriff’s Department’s Public Information Officer replied back four hours later.

“Hi Parimal, Thank you for reaching out. I’d be happy to assist with connecting you to Lt. Corn to provide clarification on these answers and additional updates. For example, the docks are not reduced to 20 minutes at this time,” Orange County Sheriff’s Department Public Information Officer Carrie Braun said in her reply.

The 20-minute time limit, of course, is no longer in effect, thanks to the intervention of the California Coastal Commission. Whether or not the time limit is still in effect, of course, is not relevant. Was Corn authorized to cut down the dock time from 72 hours to 20 minutes? Or was this a decision the county’s Board of Supervisors was supposed to make?

This writer replied to Braun’s email with the just referenced questions in mind.

“Hi Carrie, I’d be free to chat anytime today but the question I have is specific and legal. The question is whether Lt. Corn had the authority to make the decision to alter the dock usage time from 72 hours to 20 minutes,” this writer said in his reply. “It’s a narrow question, focusing on the time the decision was made and who made it. That’s the only question I need clarification on, and it’s something I’d need an attorney to answer. If County Counsel won’t be able to answer this question, I’ll pose this question to another attorney who specializes in government affairs.”

The email referenced in the previous paragraph, a copy of which was forwarded to Page, was sent to Braun the morning of July 19; she replied back later that same morning.

“That makes complete sense. It will be up to the CEO’s office to reply and answer that specific question,” Braun said in her July 19 reply.

Both Braun and Corn, meanwhile, maintained The Log’s recent coverage of this issue has been filled with some misrepresentations. Our follow-up reporting of this story will provide Corn and the Sheriff’s Department a platform to outline the issues they have with The Log’s reporting.

The Log will continue to pursue the legal questions posed in this and previous coverage.

Share This:

5 thoughts on “Orange County contemplating answers to questions about Newport Beach docks decision

  • Larry Fancher

    No single officer is logically entitled to unilaterally change the time rules on Orange County Docks. I can’t see that the legal answer will differ from my opinion [which is based on primary logic]. Also, there may be some facts missing from the allegation.

    Reply
  • Reasonable Boater

    The County response verifies that Lt. Corn had no authority to close the visitor dock and dinghy dock at Newport Harbor Patrol HQ. Only the Director of OC Parks (Harbors, Beaches and Parks) has that authority. It is my understanding that Lt. Corn unilaterally closed these docks within approximately month of accepting the position of Harbormaster. It appears he was “flexing his muscle” at the cost of public access. Now the County is trying to approve his ill-advised action retroactively because nobody wants to stand up against the politically powerful Sheriff.
    If this situation concerns you, please email OC Supervisor Michelle Steele as this matter is in her district. Her email is: Michelle.Steel@ocgov.com

    It is clear to me that the OCSD Harbor Patrol is solely interested in creating a comfortable workplace for themselves in Newport by shutting out the public. Public service is not meant to be “comfortable”. It is meant to serve the public that pays your salary.

    Reply
  • Concerned Boater

    Reasonable Boater,
    Did they “CLOSE” the dinghy dock since last week? Nope!! So how does making a time limit change to the dingy dock create a more “comfortable workplace” for the Harbor Patrol? Also, I believe the current Harbormaster started in March of 2018, so it wasn’t one month from the time he arrived. You should read all the applicable OCCO sections, i’d be willing to bet there is more than one that applies to this before giving your legal opinion. I believe the Director of OC Parks can delegate his/her authority to others as described in the OCCOs. Have you spoken with the Director? What was his/her opinion of the time limit changes?

    Lastly, I believe the Harbor Patrol personnel pay taxes like you, so therefore they pay part of their own salary.

    Reply
  • Mike Seldano

    I agree, the Sheriff’s Harbor Patrol has forgotten what public service is all about. They don’t even have a visitor dock any longer. I guess they don’t want to deal with boaters. It just doesn’t seem right!

    Reply
    • Avid Boater

      When I asked about the dock, I was told it had to be changed to emergencies only due to ‘visitors’ docking and walking the dock, looking and climbing on the police boats. Seems reasonable to me, given it is a police station. I’m actually surprised they don’t have more security in place than they do.

      Reply

Leave a Reply to Mike Seldano Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *