Surfrider Foundation continues to push for removal of Long Beach breakwater

Will U.S. Army Corps of Engineers take offshore breakwater off the map or keep it in place?

LONG BEACH — Plans to modify the large breakwater off the Long Beach coast could shift from complete removal of the 2.2-mile stretch of aquatic infrastructure to keeping the offshore string of rocks in place, according to those familiar with the situation.

A member of Surfrider Foundation’s Long Beach Chapter confirmed they met with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in June to discuss the future of the offshore breakwater, which is located just outside the Port of Long Beach entrance. The breakwater was the third of three built south of San Pedro, Terminal Island and Long Beach. Federal officials established the San Pedro Breakwater in 1912, followed by the Middle Breakwater near Terminal Island in 1942 and Long Beach Breakwater in 1949.

The Corp of Engineers appeared to be moving forward with a plan to remove the Long Beach Breakwater entirely, partnering with the city of Long Beach to complete the project. Recent reports from local news outlets and the Surfrider Foundation, however, indicate the federal agency might do an about-face and keep the string of rocks in place.

Surfrider Foundation wants the Long Beach Breakwater removed in order to improve surf conditions along the city’s extended coastline. Long Beach was once home to ambitious surfers seeking to catch large waves, but local waters were tamed once federal officials built the nearby breakwater.

Representatives with the Corps of Engineers, meanwhile, have not revealed much in terms of updates, so whether or not plans to remove Long Beach Breakwater will remain intact remains unclear.

Removal of the breakwater – referred to as “The Surfrider Alternative” – could bring back Long Beach’s once famous surf action, but it is unclear what the change in current activity would mean for the city’s downtown area marinas. Rainbow and Shoreline marinas weren’t active destinations for recreational boaters until the 1950s – after the Long Beach Breakwater was built.

A 14-page letter from Surfrider Foundation to the Corp of Engineers in 2016 made the case for removing the Long Beach Breakwater and allowing surf/wave action along the city’s coastline to be revived.

“The Surfrider Alternative proposes to restore sandy bottom habitat by reconfiguring the Breakwater, bringing waves back to the shores of Long Beach, and mitigating for impacts,” Seamus Ian Innes, president of the foundation’s Long Beach Chapter, wrote in the 2016 letter to the Corp of Engineers.

“The ecosystem to be restored within the Surfrider Alternative consists of a restored sandy bottom benthic invertebrate habitat, with increased water circulation, improved water quality, increased mixing, decreased pollutant loading, a change from silty bottom to sandy bottom habitat, and increased oxygen content (due to breaking wave induced aeration),” Innes continued in his 2016 letter.

Innes added removal of the Long Beach Breakwater would increase the density of a giant kelp habitat nearby while also improving recreation activities (such as diving, fishing, surfing, swimming and general beach use).

The Long Beach Breakwater is also a navigational hazard, according to Innes.

“The Breakwater as it currently exists it is a hazard to small craft navigation. It is a common occurrence for small craft to lose propulsion outside the Breakwater and drift onto the rocks. This has resulted in countless rescue and hazardous agent or spill containment operations by the Coast Guard, Lifeguards, Long Beach Fire Department, Long Beach Health Department, and Vessel Assist,” Innes wrote in 2016. “These incidents have resulted in recreational coastal closures, required water quality testing and monitoring, damage to the watercraft, injury and death.”

Surfing was a popular pastime in Long Beach prior to the breakwater’s installation. The city, colloquially hailed as the Waikiki of the West Coast, hosted the National Surfing Championships in 1938. Long Beach would no longer be a surfing destination when easternmost of three breakwaters was built off the city’s coast in 1949. Federal officials reportedly built the breakwaters to benefit Navy and port activities in the area.

Southern California’s suburban population explosion was still a few years away when the Long Beach Breakwater was built. Surfrider Foundation believes removal of the youngest of the three breakwaters will benefit anglers, divers, habitats, local beachgoers and surfers. Whether the breakwater’s removal would benefit or harm boaters at Long Beach’s marinas, however, is still up in the air.

Share This:

2 thoughts on “Surfrider Foundation continues to push for removal of Long Beach breakwater

  • sam port

    The fate of the Breakwater will be determined by the Money that drives the politics. It is and never will be about what is the Right thing to do to make our beaches better. It will come down to Who will pay for it and Who will it affect the most in terms of real estate values. It always comes down to the Money … sad but true.

  • Geoff Vanden Heuvel

    Surfers have many miles of coastline to enjoy their love. The Long Beach Breakwater provides a unique protected ocean experience for small boaters and small sailboats to enjoy. There is nothing else like it on the entire California and Oregon coasts. Furthermore as was explained in detail by a man who has been diving the breakwater for decades at the public meeting the Corp had on this issue back in 2016, the Long Beach Breakwater is now habitat to an amazing variety of fish and sea creatures in addition to a nesting and resting area for birds. It is near pure selfishness for the Surfrider community to try to take away something so special that serves so many when they have so many options here in So Cal and up and down the coast.



Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *