Bills to Watch in 2020: War on Single Use Plastics

Two bills aimed at reducing single use plastics, AB 1080 and SB 54, didn’t pass the 2019 legislative session but have limited time to be revived in 2020.

SACRAMENTO—Things are again buzzing in the state capital, where assembly members reconvened Jan. 6 for the new legislative session. Activity has been busy with new bills coming in and legislators trying to resuscitate their bills that didn’t get approved in 2019. This year provides a window for legislative revival.

Two bills aimed at reducing plastic trash in the state’s harbors, beaches and the Pacific Ocean are among them. Both Senate Bill 54 (SB 54), authored by State Sen. Ben Allen, D-Santa Monica, and Assembly Bill 1080 (AB 1080), authored by Assembly Member Lorena Gonzalez, D-San Diego, failed to pass in 2019.

Both AB 1080 and SB 54, if they are brought back to life, could require all single-use packaging and priority single-use products manufactured on or after Jan. 1, 2030 to be recyclable or compostable. The bills would apply to all single-use products offered for sale, sold, distributed, or imported in or into California. Both bills aim to achieve a statewide 75 percent reduction of the waste generated from single-use packaging and priority single-use products by 2030. SB 54 noted without action, projections estimate that by 2050 the mass of plastic pollution in the ocean will exceed the mass of fish.

Bill supporters have already been drumming up support for the bills. The Surfrider Foundation San Diego County hosted a beach cleanup at Ocean Beach Jan. 4, attended by Gonzalez, to also push for the passage of AB 1080 and SB 54.

“It’s time to eliminate single-use plastics in California,” Gonzalez wrote on Twitter the day of the cleanup.

While legislators address the topic at the state capital, environmental groups are hoping to bring the issue straight to voters. Several organizations filed a ballot initiative in November 2019 to impose significant new waste reduction requirements on producers of single-use packaging.

If enough signatures are collected, the California Packaging Waste Reduction Regulations Initiative (#19-0028) may appear on the Nov. 3, 2020 ballot in California as an initiated state statute.

The measure would require that single-use plastic packaging, containers, and utensils be reusable, recyclable, or compostable by 2030, with the goal of reducing such waste by 25 percent. It would also prohibit polystyrene container use by food vendors and tax producers of single-use plastic packaging, containers, or utensils by Jan. 1, 2022, and allocate revenues for recycling and environmental programs, including local water supply protection.

In order for the initiative to get certified for the 2020 ballot, it must get signatures equal to five percent of the votes cast in the preceding gubernatorial election, which would be 623,212. The deadline for signature verification is June 25.

Coastal cities have also taken up the issue on a local level. Southern California cities such as Santa Monica have banned the use of all single-use plastics in the food and beverage industry. Many cities are now also considering or passing a ban on foil and latex balloon releases and sales, another form of debris polluting local waters and harming marine life. Manhattan Beach banned the release balloons and the sale of Mylar/foil balloons in 2019. Redondo Beach was the latest to join the growing number of cities banning plastics. On Jan. 14 the City Council voted to ban single use plastics and polystyrene products as well as Mylar balloons.

Share This:

2 thoughts on “Bills to Watch in 2020: War on Single Use Plastics

  • January 23, 2020 at 3:04 pm

    I am sure that the tyrants in Sacramento are working as hard as they can to tell us how to live our lives, Stalin would be proud. So much for a free country.

  • August 10, 2020 at 6:59 am

    its true we should burn single use plastics if an alternative has been given of using paper bags and question the manufacturers of plastics on what next after their products have been brought into the community and what is there plan B on the plastics after being used by the people they give them to. How are they ensuring that they protecting the environment from the harm full plastics , so if there is no plan B or way forward about this then they should be burned from manufacturing until they show us the way forward in their protection of the environment from their manufacturing of plastics . no offence but that the reality since they are kill the environment that me and my children and grandchildren would have leaved in.



Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *