Is managed retreat a viable response to sea level rise?
California Coastal Commission discusses merits of retreating inland should worst-case scenario flooding events occur.
CALABASAS—Much of the discussion surrounding climate change is what can we do today to prevent certain events, like sea level rise, from happening in the future. The California Coastal Commission, on Dec. 12, 2019, received a presentation of what we could be doing in the event sea level rise already happened. Coastal Commission staff and a representative from the Nature Conservancy made the sea level rise presentation during the second day of meetings in Calabasas.
There will always be voices questioning whether climate change or sea level rise are actual phenomena, but other corners will work to be prepared for the worst, even if the worst never happens. Putting a plan in motion for what a community should do in the event of worst-case scenario sea level rise isn’t necessarily a waste of time or effort.
This certainly appears to be the mantra of the Coastal Commission, which hosted another presentation on sea level rise. Several presentations on sea level rise have been made in front of the quasi-judicial agency during the past few years – and this most recent one on Dec. 12, 2019, focused on managed retreat.
Managed retreat is a coastal management strategy where the shoreline is allowed to move inland (as opposed to strategies like coastal armoring, an attempt the keep the shoreline in place and keep water from penetrating inland).
Los Angeles and Ventura counties were the two areas Coastal Commission staff focused on during this most recent presentation.
Madeline Cavalieri, a district manager with the Coastal Commission, spent her portion of the presentation explaining the threats Los Angeles and Ventura counties face in the next decade.
The northern part of Ventura County is mostly subject to coastal erosion, while the Oxnard Plains area is already exposed to significant flooding, Cavalieri said in her presentation.
More than 90 percent of Ventura County’s shoreline consists of sandy beaches, according to Cavalieri. These beaches draw more than three million visitor days per year, generating an estimated economic value of $156 million, Cavalieri continued.
“Even at a low sea level rise projection of eight inches, storm, flood and wave impacts will threaten most of the county’s beach and dune habitats as soon as 2030,” Cavalieri said.
L.A. County, meanwhile, is home to more than 100 miles of beaches and two major ports (Los Angeles and Long Beach). Roughly one in four Californians live in L.A. County, Cavalieri added.
The county’s Department of Beaches and Harbors recently conducted a study of the Los Angeles County waterfront and determined 1-1.5 feet of sea level rise would be a tipping point for decision-making. Anything at or above this level would overwhelm the county’s short-term solutions to changing conditions.
Sand replenishment projects and seasonal berms have often been relied upon for local storm or wave management, but this could change if sea level rise becomes a reality, according to Cavalieri.
Cavalieri said Long Beach’s Alamitos Bay is already starting to experience the effects of sea level rise. The city conducted a vulnerability assessment in 2015.
“The report states that increased storm frequency and high tides combined with El Nino conditions, will have a large impact on coastal residence, development and infrastructure along the highly developed coastline in the city,” Cavalieri told commissioners during her report. “Increased flooding, erosion and permanent inundation has been predicted in low-lying areas of Long Beach and is already happening along the peninsula and Alamitos Bay.”
Alyssa Mann, who spoke to the Coastal Commission on behalf of The Nature Conservancy, completed the Dec. 12, 2019 presentation. Her segment of the presentation focused on sea level rise and managed retreat in Long Beach.
She explained the concept of managed retreat and delved into why it is an important and necessary tool in responding to sea level rise.
“In the era of climate change and increasingly frequent and destructive natural disasters, there are some areas where moving out of harm’s way may be the best choice from a health, safety, economic and environmental standpoint. This approach, called managed retreat, would not only benefit effected people by helping them out of hazard zones, but also provide a societal benefit as cost to taxpayers and insurance rate payers would be reduced,” Mann said. “It could also provide space to create natural buffers that protect nearby communities and restore ecological functions in high hazard zones.”
There are four stages to emergency events: preparedness (pre-disaster); response (immediately after disaster); recovery; and, mitigation/risk-reduction, according to Mann. Retreat, whether managed or not, could occur during recovery or mitigation/risk-reduction.
The Nature Conservancy, according to Mann, is working with Virtual Planet to develop a program called “Sea Level Rise Explorer.” The program would visualize the effects of sea level rise and present solutions. The virtual reality program would be implemented in Long Beach.
“The purpose of the VR is not to scare people but to create realistic understanding of the issue and to show many of the solutions that might be possible,” Mann told commissioners during her presentation.
Commissioners and commission staff also discussed the possibility of incorporating economic analyses into sea level rise planning and responses.
Narrowneck artificial reefs were suggested as a possible tool to address sea level rise.
The Coastal Commission did not take any action based on the sea level rise presentation, which was made during the early stages of the Dec. 12, 2019 meeting in Calabasas.
One thought on “Is managed retreat a viable response to sea level rise?”
Thus far,I have not been able to determine that there is any evidence of actual sea level rise exists anywhere in the world. I am not saying it does not, but to the extent I can read and evaluate reports, not yet. Of the many vulnerable areas, two of the widely anticipated early victims were Kiribati and Netherlands. Both are still with us, and Netherlands appears to be surviving quite well, with no land loss for either. Cliff collapse and beach erosion existed in California long before man supposedly produced enough heat to be have an noticeable environmental effect, and I am of the “opinion” (note the quotes for emphasis) that the twin beliefs that we are a significant cause/and can reverse global warming (or climate change) is simply hubris and chicanery, often with corrupt motivation. Sure, we can reduce our influence, probably to our own detriment, with little benefit to the environment. I hope any reader paid attention to the separation of of what I represent as fact and opinion.